What is a false statement regarding patent claims filed in a continuation application?

In the context of continuation applications, a false statement is that claims can be broader than claims in the parent application. When filing a continuation application, the claims must be supported by the originally disclosed subject matter from the parent application. This means that the claims cannot introduce new matter or go beyond the scope of what was originally described.

The content of the claims in a continuation application is typically expected to be either the same as those in the parent application or narrower but must not be broader. This requirement helps maintain the integrity of the original disclosure and ensures that the claims do not introduce issues pertaining to the original filing date or scope of invention.

The other statements are true: claims in a continuation must relate to the originally disclosed subject matter, they can indeed be narrower than the claims in the prior application, and they must adhere to the original intent of the earlier claims. Each of these aspects supports the historical context and foundational principles underlying patent law, which prioritize clarity and consistency in the claims made.